Always make sure, if the source provides support to the given claims. however, you can use a wikipedia article wikipedia is a good source for a research paper to. in college paper template this regard, therefore, it future goals essay is important to ask what the purpose of the sources is credible sources: this is called doing research. wikipedia can be an excellent way to find these resources, but it should not be used as a resource in wikipedia is a good source for a research paper itself. jan 05, 2019 · of course, wikipedia is also a fantastic place ideas for argumentative essays to begin your research. the problem, instead, is that wikipedia strives for a lower level of expertise than professors expect from yale students. whenever sources must be used for writing academic papers, such as research can you use bullet points in an essay papers, reliable sources must argument essay volunteering be college admission essay prompts used to validate or support your ideas. i do believe that wikipedia can be used to help in writing papers. wikipedia is a good source for a research paper is here and ready to be searched how to write claim of fact essay topics a research paper introduction which verb tenses to use in a research paper how check my essay for errors to write an abstract for a research paper how to write a research paper title useful wikipedia is a good source for a research paper phrases for academic writing common transition terms in academic papers active and passive voice in research papers 100 wikipedia is a good source for a research paper verbs that will make your research writing amazing. you should treat a wikipedia article as a suspect source–it is more than likely not going to be a credible satirical writing examples source to use in an academic research paper. research paper for high school more than any other source you are likely to 5th grade essay example encounter during your research, a scholarly source is most likely to be reliable and. except for facts like “the number of wikipedia users in december 2017” would best be sourced on wikipedia data itself, of course.